I tested a $20 smart scale against a $8,500 body composition machine – these were the surprising results

Trending 1 week ago
Vitafit smart standard logo
(Image credit: Future)

For a small complete 4 months I’ve been utilizing a Vitafit smart standard to support way of my assemblage weight. Buying 1 of nan best smart scales is 1 of nan easiest ways to show your weight and cardinal metrics for illustration assemblage wide scale (BMI), assemblage fat, and more. It tin springiness you penetration into really galore calories you should beryllium eating a time to suffer weight and tin thief way your advancement complete time.

I bought my Vitafit from Amazon for astir $20, and I honestly wasn’t expecting much. I’ve been pleasantly amazed by its interface and features, but heavy down I’ve ever been resigned to nan truth that it astir apt wasn’t each that accurate. The results are ever consistent, truthful comparative results are still helpful, but I wasn’t really nether immoderate illusion that it was a genuinely meticulous scale.

That was until I tested it during my caller Vitafit Bathroom Scale review. When it comes to nan capacity of a smart scale, nan only existent trial of its caliber is accuracy. I’m fortunate capable to unrecorded adjacent doorway to a modern, well-equipped gym that’s location to an all-singing, all-dancing assemblage creation machine, truthful I decided to person a spot of a showdown, and you stake I was amazed by nan results.

The Tanita MC-780MA P is simply a £6,500 / $8,500 / AU$12,500 assemblage creation show boasting Japanese-engineered precision and objective accuracy. It delivers complete 20 full assemblage measurements (including BMI, Fat Mass, and more) 9 segmental measurements (segmental assemblage fat, etc), and more. It boasts Class III Non Automatic Weighting Instrument (NAWI) accuracy and MDD Class II-a aesculapian instrumentality classification. Basically, it’s immoderate of nan champion assemblage creation tech connected nan market.

So conscionable really good does our $20 wellness leader stack up to this $8,500 behemoth? I ran a bid of controlled tests connected nan Vitafit and nan Tanita to find out. I tested myself connected nan Vitafit, past nan Tanita, and past nan Vitafit again a short clip later, pinch a short locomotion successful betwixt arsenic I traveled to and from nan trial site. The results were a mixed bag, but wide I was blown distant by really meticulous nan Vitafit proved successful immoderate cardinal measurements, plentifulness of different figures were successful nan ballpark, and only a mates stood retired arsenic chaotic aliases erratic.

The brace stock 11 full measurements: here’s really they stacked up.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Weight (KG)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Weight107.75107.6107.45

The Vitafit came wrong 0.15 kg of nan Tanita for assemblage weight successful some measurements. The second little weight reflects nan power I’d expended stepping to and from my gym betwixt nan 2nd tests.

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, apical tech deals, and more.

Weight is nan halfway metric of a smart standard and nan astir important number erstwhile it comes to wide health, calorie tracking, and more. I couldn’t judge nan Vitafit was truthful adjacent to nan Tanita, a awesome start.

Vitafit LED surface showing 11.75 kilograms

(Image credit: Future)

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Body Fat (%)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Body Fat26.127.426

I’d been suspicious of nan Vitafit’s bodyfat readings, and nan smart standard does so look to beryllium lacking here, which is simply a shame because it’s an important reading. Having precocious assemblage fat tin summation your consequence of definite diseases, but having excessively small tin besides beryllium dangerous. Vitafit seems to beryllium lowballing this one, reference betwixt 1.3-1.4% little than nan Tanita. That’s rather a important discrepancy successful a reference of astir 26-27%.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Fat Free Mass (FFM) (KG)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Fat Free Mass79.6478.179.52

Fat Free Mass is nan magnitude of your assemblage that’s not made up of fat, broadly your thin mass, skeleton, and more. If you’re trying to suffer weight aliases get successful shape, you ideally want to trim down nan aforementioned assemblage fat while holding onto arsenic overmuch FFM arsenic possible, aliases moreover building it up done spot and guidance training.

Vitafit seems to beryllium overegging this one, measuring 1.4-1.5kg much than nan Tanita. However, that checks retired erstwhile you see it’s underestimating assemblage fat.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Bone Mass (KG)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Bone Mass3.893.83.89

Bone Mass measures nan magnitude of minerals contained successful a definite measurement of bony (definition) and tin beryllium utilized to measurement bony density, way osteoporosis treatment, and foretell really apt bones are to break. Vitafit excelled here, coming wrong 90 grams of nan Tanita measurement connected some occasions, a really awesome score.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Muscle Mass (KG)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Muscle Mass75.7474.375.64

Muscle Mass is simply a self-explanatory reference (it’s nan magnitude of musculus your assemblage is carrying) and is different awesome metric to way if you’re trying to summation musculus wide aliases suffer weight. Generally, arsenic pinch FFM, you ideally want to clasp onto arsenic overmuch musculus arsenic imaginable (or build more) while reducing your assemblage fat, if you’re trying to suffer weight. Obviously, this will dangle connected your fittingness goals (that maxim won’t use to marathon runners, for instance), but search it tin thief you show and debar musculus atrophy (muscle thinning aliases wastage).

This is simply a trickier comparison because Vitafit gives musculus wide arsenic a percent of your assemblage weight, alternatively than successful kilos. However, according to my calculations, it’s overestimating musculus wide by 1.3-1.4kg.

Again, this afloat checks retired pinch nan discrepancy successful assemblage fat above.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Visceral fat
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Visceral fat181018

Visceral fat measures nan magnitude of belly fat successful your abdominal cavity, arsenic opposed to subcutaneous fat, which lives beneath your skin. A patient magnitude is important to protect your organs, but excessively overmuch tin lead to superior wellness issues. Visceral fat is usually expressed simply arsenic a number, and present Vitafit threw retired 1 of its biggest discrepancies.

Tanita clocked maine astatine a 10, while nan Vitafit scored maine a whopping 18. This is doubly annoying because nan erstwhile (according to Tanita’s ain scale) is healthy, while nan second is excessive. Considering that nan Vitafit underestimated wide assemblage fat, this is simply a further astonishing result. It won’t astonishment you to study I’m going pinch Tanita connected this one.

Vitafit app pinch metrics alongside nan smart scale

(Image credit: Future)

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Body h2o (%)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Body water46.3051.8046.30

Body h2o is nan full magnitude of fluid successful your assemblage and a cardinal marker of dehydration. I’m judge I don’t request to expound connected nan benefits of drinking h2o to you, but it’s worthy knowing that nan perfect normal scope for big women is 45-60%, and for men, it’s 50-65%.

As you tin see, nan Vitafti is much than 5% disconnected here, which is simply a worrying discrepancy considering nan normal scope is only a 15% margin. This is different 1 I’m taking pinch a pinch of brackish (or should I opportunity electrolytes?). The Vitafit assemblage h2o measurements were identical some times arsenic well, truthful this is an denotation of measuring troubles alternatively than an anomaly.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

BMI
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
BMI32.232.132.2

Body Mass Index is 1 of nan wellness markers you’re apt astir acquainted with, particularly if you were ever fat-shamed by a Nintendo Wii Fit backmost successful nan day. It’s fundamentally your assemblage wide divided by nan quadrate of your assemblage height, expressed arsenic a number. There are immoderate limitations because it only measures wide weight alternatively than assemblage composition.

For example, a hefty American Football subordinate successful awesome shape, but carrying a ample magnitude of muscle, would easy people an obese rating. For nan Vitafit, however, it’s different drawstring to nan bow, scoring wrong 0.1 of nan Tanita. BMI isn’t a cleanable marker of wellness these days, but if you request to cognize it you tin count connected Vitafit.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

BMR (kcal)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
BMR215523572155

Basal Metabolic Rate is nan number of calories your assemblage needs to prolong itself time to day, and a captious portion of accusation for anyone trying to suffer aliases summation weight, aliases so trying to prolong their existent weight. There’s a discrepancy of astir 200 calories betwixt nan Vitafit and nan Tanita here, but because BMR is simply a calculation alternatively than a measurement, I’m going to fto this 1 slide.

There are aggregate ways to cipher BMR – nan Mifflin-St Jeor equation, nan Revised Harris-Benedict equation, and nan Katch-McArdle Formula to sanction 3 – and Vitafit and Tanita whitethorn apt beryllium utilizing different formulas, which often disagree by 10% successful my experience.

Vitafit smart scale

(Image credit: Future)

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Skeletal Muscle wide (%)
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Skeletal Muscle wide 41.840.141.8

Skeletal musculus wide makes up nan muscles connected to your bones and usually comprises 30-40% of your full mass. They supply nan powerfulness you request to move astir and protect your joints, truthful having a patient magnitude is simply a bully marker of wide well-being. Expressed arsenic a percentage, nan Vitafit was 1.7% disconnected successful some instances here, it’s not a cleanable measurement but it’s besides not a immense discrepancy.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Metabolic age
Row 0 - Cell 0 Vitafit (first test)TanitaVitafit (second test)
Metabolic age244424

Your metabolic property is simply a comparison of your BMR versus nan mean for your property group. Ideally, you want a people that reflects your existent property aliases is little than your existent age. The Vitafita and Tanita were worlds isolated here, but I reckon there’s a bully explanation. As noted, nan BMR scores fixed by each were very different, apt reflecting different methodologies. Using nan aforesaid disparate numbers to cipher Metabolic Age is apt why nan Vitafit says I’m 24 while nan Tanita says I’m 44.

Measuring up

Vitafit smart scale

(Image credit: Future)

As you tin see, nan Tanita was ever going to beryllium nan clear victor erstwhile it comes to precision and accuracy, but I was really amazed by conscionable really good nan Vitafit kept up. I couldn’t judge that measurements for illustration weight, BMI, and bony wide were truthful adjacent to nan dense hitter’s readings.

Undoubtedly, this testing does uncover immoderate of nan limitations of a smart scale, and clearly, nan $20 Vitafit struggles much pinch nan creation facet of its duties, notably for assemblage fat, musculus mass, and water.

I’m little concerned astir BMR and metabolic property because those look to beryllium calculations alternatively than measurements.

Overall, I’m thoroughly impressed pinch conscionable really good my $20 smart standard held its ain against an $8,500 assemblage creation machine. If anything, this shows that splashing retired a spot much connected nan champion smart scales connected nan marketplace should output moreover much meticulous results.

In nan meantime, moreover nan cheapest smart standard you tin find will bring you immoderate benefits successful position of search that tin thief you suffer weight and instrumentality to your fittingness goals. Check retired our guideline connected how to usage a smart scale for much accusation connected utilizing them.

Perhaps much importantly, these results show that Vitafit nan is giving retired accordant measurements pinch each use, moreover if they're not ever accurate. With that successful mind, you tin return these results pinch a pinch of brackish and still usage a smart standard for illustration this 1 to awesome effect.

Stephen Warwick is TechRadar's Fitness & Wearables writer pinch astir a decade of acquisition covering technology, including 5 years arsenic nan News Editor of iMore. He's a keen fittingness enthusiast and is ne'er acold from nan section gym, Apple Watch astatine nan ready, to grounds his latest workout. Stephen has acquisition penning astir each facet of exertion including products, services, hardware, and software. He's covered breaking news and processing stories regarding proviso chains, patents and litigation, competition, authorities and lobbying, nan environment, and more. He's conducted interviews pinch manufacture experts successful a scope of fields including finance, litigation, security, and more. Outside of work, he's a monolithic tech and history buff pinch a passion for Rome Total War, reading, and music. 

More
Source Technology
Technology